Would it seem to be a sort of accident if it turned out that a situation would fit a thing that could already exist entirely on its own? though it tells nothing is accidental - if a thing can occur in a state of affairs, the possibility of the state of affairs must be written into the thing itself.

In order to be able to represent logical form, we should have to be able to station ourselves with proposition somewhere outside logic, that is to say outside the world, though it is not just about logic and the world, in-and-outside, it is about your life - faith, journey, choice, pain and consistency of inner and outer existence. Why you escape? from the emotion arisen and the affection imagined yet through which you see survival time and time again...why get into such a stress? why fear? though it is also not just about affection, about worrying would it probably get you into another situation that you would much prefer to build complex theoretical solution and leave system implementation to others yet get trapped in current situation?

It also tells the best cure for this reticence is experience: to express feeling, to live through disharmony and to overcome when more balanced dynamics result from increasing maturity...though kinda hurting sometimes, seems a deserving journey huh? of my unforeseen, yet your foreseen, not accidentally.